Research Paper Volume 13, Issue 6 pp 8146—8154
Early-onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy progression: a biopsy-based study
- 1 Division of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 2 Laboratory of Diabetic Kidney Disease, Centre of Diabetes and Metabolism Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 3 Division of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 4 Department of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 5 Division of Endocrinology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Received: October 12, 2020 Accepted: January 22, 2021 Published: March 3, 2021
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202624How to Cite
Copyright: © 2021 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Several studies show that patients with early-onset diabetes have higher risk of diabetic complications than those diagnosed in middle age. However, whether early-onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy (DN) progression remains unclear, especially a lack of data in biopsy-confirmed cohort. In This study, we enrolled 257 patients with T2DM and biopsy-confirmed DN to investigate the role of early-onset T2DM in DN progression. Participants were divided into two groups according to the age of T2DM diagnosis: early-onset group (less than 40 years) and later-onset group (40 years or older). We found that patients with early-onset T2DM had higher glomerular grades and arteriolar hyalinosis scores than those in later-onset group. After adjusted for confounding factors, early-onset of T2DM remained an independent predictor of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) for patients with DN. In conclusion, although with the comparable renal function and proteinuria, patients with early-onset T2DM and DN had worse renal pathological changes than those with later-onset. Early-onset of T2DM might be an important predictor of ESRD for patients with DN, which called more attention to early supervision and prevention for patients with early-onset T2DM and DN.
Introduction
During the past decades, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been increasing around the world, more than 90% of which were type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) [1]. As one of the major microvascular complication, diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in developed countries as well as in some developing countries, which causes huge healthy and economic burden worldwide [2, 3]. Several factors have been clarified to be related to DN progression, such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia as well as the DN duration [4]. The impact of onset age of T2DM on DN remains to be investigated.
Although much attention has been paid on older patients with T2DM, young people suffered from T2DM was not well recognized. The age of patients with T2DM is falling and the incidence of early-onset T2DM has been rising rapidly in recent years [5]. For these patients, early-onset of T2DM meant longer exposure of metabolic disorders and higher risk for chronic diabetic complications [6]. Some previous studies showed that compared with those diagnosed in older people, patients with early-onset T2DM might have higher risk of albuminuria progression and ESRD [7, 8]. However, DN is a complex disease with high degree of heterogeneity and various clinic manifestations. Participants of most studies were clinical diagnosed rather than pathology-proven according to kidney biopsy, which could cause misdiagnosis for non-diabetic renal diseases (NDRD) [9–13] and normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease [14]. Whether early-onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy (DN) progression remains unclear. Therefore, it makes sense to identify the role of early-onset T2DM in the progression of DN in a biopsy-confirmed cohort.
In this study, we investigated the clinical features, renal pathologic changes, and renal outcome in T2DM patients with early-onset and later-onset of T2DM in a biopsy-based cohort to elucidate the effect of early onset of T2DM on pathology and prognosis of DN, which could further indicate the role of early incidence of T2DM in well-confirmed DN patients.
Results
Baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics
A total of 257 subjects were enrolled in this study (Figure 1). At time of renal biopsy, the mean age of the patients was 51.48±9.28 years old and 69.6% (179 in 257) of them were men. 29.6% (76 in 257) of the patients had DM family history and the median T2DM duration was 8.00 (3.00,11.00) years. Hypertension presented in most of the patients (86.8%, 223 in 257), so were the use of insulin (73.2%, 188 in 257). Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was in 45.5% (117 in 257) of the total cohort. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage distribution were: stage1 28.8%, stage2 19.5%, stage3 39.3%, stage4 12.5%. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 67.35±32.55 ml/min/1.73 m with the median 24 hours urine protein excretion of 4.30g (range 2.18-7.78 g). Baseline data were shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.
Total n=257 | Early-onset n=89 | Later-onset n=168 | p | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Men (%) | 69.6 | 67.4 | 70.8 | 0.571 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age (years) | 51.48±9.28 | 43.43±7.12 | 55.75±7.23 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duration of diabetes (years) | 8.00(3.00,11.00) | 10.00(5.50,15.00) | 5.00(2.00,10.00) | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age of diabetes diagnosis (years) | 43.59±10.32 | 32.82±5.58 | 49.29±7.25 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Family history (%) | 29.6 | 43.8 | 22.0 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hypertension (%) | 86.8 | 85.4 | 87.5 | 0.635 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diabetic retinopathy (%) | 45.5 | 58.4 | 38.7 | 0.003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 7.58±1.99 | 7.52±2.13 | 7.62±1.92 | 0.754 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 7.46(5.50,9.66) | 7.52(5.19,9.70) | 7.46(5.72,9.46) | 0.775 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urinary protein excretion (g/day) | 4.30(2.18,7.78) | 4.44(2.53,9.08) | 4.26(1.88,6.81) | 0.184 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 67.35±32.55 | 70.34±36.13 | 65.77±30.48 | 0.286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum creatinine (μmol/L) | 132.85±67.63 | 132.68±66.62 | 132.94±68.35 | 0.976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum uric acid (μmol/L) | 389.04±82.91 | 387.94±84.17 | 389.62±82.49 | 0.877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.80(1.26,2.42) | 1.84(1.34,2.46) | 1.79(1.22,2.42) | 0.473 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.30±1.59 | 5.40±1.51 | 5.24±1.63 | 0.452 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LDL-C | 3.10±1.26 | 3.16±1.19 | 3.07±1.30 | 0.568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HDL-C | 1.34±0.47 | 1.32±0.41 | 1.35±0.50 | 0.590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insulin use (%) | 73.2 | 80.9 | 69.0 | 0.041 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RASI use (%) | 79.8 | 79.8 | 79.8 | 0.967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RASI, Renin-Angiotensin-System inhibitor; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Data are presented as the mean ± standard, median (quartile rang) or percentages. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. |
In terms of the pathological glomerular classification, 5.1% were in class I, 23.7% in class IIa, 9.3% in class IIb, 45.9% in class III, 16.0% in class IV. The majority (97.3%, 250 in 257) of the patients had interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA), arteriolar hyalinosis (88.7%, 228 in 257) and interstitial inflammation (92.6%, 238 in 257) pathological presentations (Table 2).
Table 2. Pathological features.
Total n=257 | Early-onset n=89 | Later-onset n=168 | p-value* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glomerular classification | 0.039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I | 13 | 4 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IIa | 61 | 19 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IIb | 24 | 6 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
III | 118 | 38 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IV | 41 | 22 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IFTA | 0.088 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 116 | 35 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 103 | 34 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 31 | 17 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interstitial inflammation | 0.606 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19 | 8 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 196 | 67 | 129 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 42 | 14 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arteriolar hyaline | 0.019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 29 | 8 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 130 | 38 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 98 | 43 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Mann-Whitney test. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. |
Relationships between early-onset T2DM and clinicopathological features
Among the cohort, 34.6% (89 in 257) patients had their T2DM diagnosed less than 40 years old. Compared with later-onset group, patients with early-onset T2DM had longer diabetes duration and more insulin use. DR presented more frequently in early-onset group. DM family history presented more in early-onset other than later-onset patients.
Baseline eGFR, 24 hours urine protein excretion, serum uric acid, serum lipid and glucose level were comparable between early-onset and later-onset groups (Table 1).
As for pathological characteristics, the early-onset group presented more severe glomerular classification and arteriolar hyaline than those in later-onset group though the renal function was comparable between these two groups (Table 2). Early-onset group had thicker glomerular basement membrane (GBM) than later-onset group (890.73 ± 268.65nm vs 795.38 ± 274.80nm, p = 0.021). We also found that the age of T2DM diagnosis was negatively correlated with the arteriolar hyaline scores (r = -0.128, p = 0.04) and the thickness of GBM (r = -0.190, p = 0.008) in the total cohort.
Early-onset of T2DM and renal outcome of DN
At the end of the follow-up, 47.1% of the patients reached the renal endpoint (121 in 257) with the median survival time of the total cohort was 38 months. The median survival was 31 months in early-onset group, while 43 months in later-onset. Log-rank test showed that patients with early-onset T2DM had worse renal prognosis than those with later-onset T2DM (p = 0.031) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Renal survival rate between patients in two groups with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The event-free survival for end stage renal diseases (p = 0.031, log-rank test).
In univariate analysis of the Cox proportional model, early-onset of T2DM was significantly associated with worse renal outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.490, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.032–2.149, p =0.033). In the case of confound factors, first we adjusted for gender, age, the duration of diabetes, serum glucose level, hypertension, serum lipid level, eGFR and urine protein excretion, early-onset group experienced higher risk of ESRD (HR 1.938; 95% CI 1.007–3.730, p = 0.047). We further adjusted insulin and rennin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) use, early-onset of T2DM remained significantly associated with worse renal outcome for DN patients (HR 1.962; 95% CI 1.018–3.782, p = 0.044).
Discussion
In this retrospective biopsy-based study, we investigated the association of the age of T2DM onset and pathological characteristics as well as renal prognosis in biopsy-proven DN. We observed that compared with patients with later-onset T2DM, early-onset patients had more severe glomerular and vascular pathological lesions, though they were with comparable baseline renal function and proteinuria. Early-onset of T2DM was significantly associated with higher risk of ESRD in patients with DN. To our knowledge, this investigation may be the first biopsy-based study to clarify the relationship between the early-onset T2DM and DN pathological lesions, as well as the renal outcome. We confirmed the evidence to support that early-onset T2DM patients had worse renal prognosis in a biopsy-proven DN cohort.
Unlike type 1 diabetes mellitus often occurred in adolescents, we used to view T2DM as an old adult disease in the past. However, in recent years, T2DM is increasingly diagnosed in adolescents and young adults [15, 16]. In some countries, the prevalence of T2DM has even exceeded T1DM among young people [5, 17]. Compared with those with later-onset T2DM, early-onset patients would have longer lifetime exposure to hyperglycemia, which could cause long-term diabetic complications. Some previous studies [18–20] have confirmed that patients with early-onset T2DM had higher prevalence of microvascular complications than those with later-onset, including DN. Our data showed that in patients with biopsy-proven DN, those with early-onset T2DM had higher risk of ESRD than later-onset ones though their renal function and proteinuria were similar at the time of renal biopsy, which was coincident with several earlier studies. Liu et al [8] found that in a 1189 Asian T2DM cohort, patients with early-onset DM had higher risk of progressive CKD in both albuminuria and renal function deterioration. Another study [21] enrolled 1111 individuals with T2DM and clinical diagnosed DN indicated that patients with early-onset had higher prevalence of ESRD and early-onset was an independent risk for ESRD after adjusted for traditional risk factors. However, patients with DN enrolled in these studies were all clinical diagnosed, which could cause misdiagnosis for NDRD. Our study added evidence to support the role of early-onset T2DM in DN among biopsy-confirmed cohort, which might clarify the direct renal complication caused by DM.
We also investigated the association between the early-onset of T2DM and renal pathological lesions in patients with DN. With the comparable eGFR and proteinuria (Table 1), early-onset group presented more severe glomerular classification and arteriolar hyaline as well as thicker GBM than those in later-onset group, which indicated worse renal pathological presentation (Table 2). Although hypertension, the serum glucose and lipid levels were similar between groups, patients with early-onset had longer diabetes duration and more insulin use, which indicated deteriorated metabolic dysfunction and caused worse pathological presentation. Our previous study [11, 22] showed that patients with severe glomerular classification and thicker GBM had higher risk of ESRD, which could partly explain why early-onset group had worse renal outcome.
The mechanisms of the association between early-onset of T2DM and DN progression remined unclear. Early-onset group had longer diabetes duration than later-onset group in our cohort, which was suggested to be related to more severe diabetic complications in some previous studies [23, 24]. However, we found that after adjusted for diabetes duration and other typical risk factors, early-onset of T2DM remained a significant predictor for ESRD in patients with DN, which suggested a sole role of early-onset in DN progression rather than resulted from longer diabetes duration. Druet et al [25] found that second phase of nutrient-induced insulin secretion might reduce faster in early-onset T2DM than elder, which might be related to abnormal tubular-glomerular feedback and cause DN progression. As TODAY Study indicated, patients with early-onset T2DM had accelerated decline of β-cell function than those with later-onset [26]. We also found more insulin use in early-onset group in this cohort. Deterioration in β-cell function meant untimely and more insulin use, which could cause chronic complications. In our study, early-onset group presented higher proportion of DM family history, which was similar with previous studies [27, 28]. A past study of our group also showed that patients with DN and family history of DM had more aggressive renal disease and rapidly falling in eGFR [29]. Other unknown factors remain further exploration.
This study has several limitations. First, we could not exclude all possible confounding factors for the complexity of DN. Then, the natural history of T2DM is quite complex, we could only trace the age they were diagnosed as T2DM rather than the precise onset time of T2DM. So the clinical silence of T2DM might affect our conclusion. Finally, it was not routine for patients with DN to undergo renal biopsy, so the sample size was limited and the patients had relatively advanced DN, which inevitably contained inherent selection bias. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm this hypothesis in large-scale biopsy cohort.
Conclusions
In conclusion, although with the comparable renal function and proteinuria, patients with early-onset T2DM and DN had worse renal pathological changes than those with later-onset. Early-onset of T2DM might be an important predictor of ESRD for patients with DN, which called more attention to early supervision and prevention for patients with early-onset T2DM and DN for the higher risk of DN progression.
Materials and Methods
Patients
Patients with T2DM who underwent renal biopsy from 2010-2018 in West China Hospital, Sichuan University were enrolled in this study. Included patients were with biopsy-confirmed DN and followed up for at least one year. Exclusion criteria were as follows: comorbid with systemic or nondiabetic renal diseases; presence of ESRD at the time of renal biopsy (Figure 1). Diagnosis of DM was based on the standard of the American Diabetes Association [30]. General indications for kidney biopsy were as follows: absence of DR, sudden onset of overt proteinuria or rapidly falling of eGFR, presence of active urinary sediment. The pathology diagnosis of DN was evaluated in 2010 Renal Pathology Society classification [31] and confirmed by at least two pathologists.
A total of 257 subjects were enrolled in this study (Figure 1). These patients were divided into two groups according to their age of T2DM diagnosis. We defined early-onset of T2DM group as less than 40 years and 40 years or older as later-onset group, just like some previous studies [21, 32]. The endpoint of patients was the progression to ESRD (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, or the initiation of renal replacement therapy). Everyone who enrolled in the study agreed and signed informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Clinical and renal pathological features
Clinical data in baseline was collected by interview and anthropometry at the time of kidney biopsy, including age, sex, duration of diabetes, family history, blood pressure, and medication history. Blood and urine samples were collected and biochemical parameters were measured by a biochemistry auto-analyzer (Cobas Intera 400 Plus, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), including serum uric acid, creatinine, triglycerides, cholesterol, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hemoglobin (Hb), and 24-hour urine protein excretion. The eGFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. DR was diagnosed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus color photography according to 2002 Global Diabetic Retinopathy Project Group standard [33]. Renal biopsy was obtained by needle and processed for light microscopy, electron microscopy and immunofluorescence to evaluate kidney pathological characteristics. Each sample was examined by at least two pathologists from the same group in West China Hospital. Pathological features were categorized for the classification of the Renal Pathology Society [31].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 (IBM, USA). Variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, median with interquartile range or proportion where appropriate. Differences between groups were assessed with the t-test for normally distributed variables, non-parametric test for skewed distributed variables and with the Chi-square test for categorical variables. Correlation testing was used to analyze the associations between early-onset of T2DM and DN. Kaplan-Meier analysis was for renal survival by log-rank test. Multivariate-Cox analysis was applied for exploring the relationship between early-onset of T2DM and renal outcome. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Author Contributions
Fang Liu, Zhonglin Chai, Mark E. Cooper and Nanwei Tong designed the study. Fang Liu supervised and offered guidance to all authors and revised the manuscript. Yucheng Wu collected the clinical data, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. Yiting Wang, Junlin Zhang, Rui Zhang, Lijun Zhao, Honghong Ren, Yutong Zou, Tingli Wang, Jiali Wang, Yuancheng Zhao, Chunmei Qin collected the data and revised the manuscript. Huan Xu and Lin Li performed the pathological diagnosis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant numbers 81970626 and 81670662]; Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Science and Technology Department [Grant number 19ZDYF1273].
References
- 1. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015; 314:1021–29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10029 [PubMed]
- 2. Afkarian M, Zelnick LR, Hall YN, Heagerty PJ, Tuttle K, Weiss NS, de Boer IH. Clinical manifestations of kidney disease among US adults with diabetes, 1988-2014. JAMA. 2016; 316:602–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.10924 [PubMed]
- 3. Zhang L, Long J, Jiang W, Shi Y, He X, Zhou Z, Li Y, Yeung RO, Wang J, Matsushita K, Coresh J, Zhao MH, Wang H. Trends in chronic kidney disease in China. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:905–06. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1602469 [PubMed]
- 4. Nanayakkara N, Ranasinha S, Gadowski A, Heritier S, Flack JR, Wischer N, Wong J, Zoungas S. Age, age at diagnosis and diabetes duration are all associated with vascular complications in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2018; 32:279–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.11.009 [PubMed]
- 5. Lascar N, Brown J, Pattison H, Barnett AH, Bailey CJ, Bellary S. Type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 6:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30186-9 [PubMed]
- 6. Copeland KC, Silverstein J, Moore KR, Prazar GE, Raymer T, Shiffman RN, Springer SC, Thaker VV, Anderson M, Spann SJ, Flinn SK, and American Academy of Pediatrics. Management of newly diagnosed type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2013; 131:364–82. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3494 [PubMed]
- 7. Pavkov ME, Bennett PH, Knowler WC, Krakoff J, Sievers ML, Nelson RG. Effect of youth-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus on incidence of end-stage renal disease and mortality in young and middle-aged pima Indians. JAMA. 2006; 296:421–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.4.421 [PubMed]
- 8. Liu JJ, Liu S, Gurung RL, Ang K, Tang WE, Sum CF, Tavintharan S, Lim SC. Risk of progressive chronic kidney disease in individuals with early-onset type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020; 35:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy211 [PubMed]
- 9. Klessens CQ, Woutman TD, Veraar KA, Zandbergen M, Valk EJ, Rotmans JI, Wolterbeek R, Bruijn JA, Bajema IM. An autopsy study suggests that diabetic nephropathy is underdiagnosed. Kidney Int. 2016; 90:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.01.023 [PubMed]
- 10. Oh SW, Kim S, Na KY, Chae DW, Kim S, Jin DC, Chin HJ. Clinical implications of pathologic diagnosis and classification for diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012; 97:418–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.016 [PubMed]
- 11. Li L, Zhang X, Li Z, Zhang R, Guo R, Yin Q, Yang L, Yue R, Su B, Huang S, Xu H, He C, Liu F. Renal pathological implications in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with renal involvement. J Diabetes Complications. 2017; 31:114–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.10.024 [PubMed]
- 12. Fiorentino M, Bolignano D, Tesar V, Pisano A, Biesen WV, Tripepi G, D’Arrigo G, Gesualdo L, and ERA-EDTA Immunonephrology Working Group. Renal biopsy in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of 48 studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw070 [PubMed]
- 13. Soleymanian T, Hamid G, Arefi M, Najafi I, Ganji MR, Amini M, Hakemi M, Tehrani MR, Larijani B. Non-diabetic renal disease with or without diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: clinical predictors and outcome. Ren Fail. 2015; 37:572–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2015.1007804 [PubMed]
- 14. Chen C, Wang C, Hu C, Han Y, Zhao L, Zhu X, Xiao L, Sun L. Normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease. Front Med. 2017; 11:310–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-017-0542-7 [PubMed]
- 15. Harron KL, Feltbower RG, McKinney PA, Bodansky HJ, Campbell FM, Parslow RC. Rising rates of all types of diabetes in south Asian and non-south Asian children and young people aged 0-29 years in West Yorkshire, U.K., 1991-2006. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:652–54. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1512 [PubMed]
- 16. Lammi N, Taskinen O, Moltchanova E, Notkola IL, Eriksson JG, Tuomilehto J, Karvonen M. A high incidence of type 1 diabetes and an alarming increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes among young adults in Finland between 1992 and 1996. Diabetologia. 2007; 50:1393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0690-4 [PubMed]
- 17. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, Divers J, Isom S, Dolan L, Imperatore G, Linder B, Marcovina S, Pettitt DJ, Pihoker C, Saydah S, Wagenknecht L, and SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376:1419–29. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610187 [PubMed]
- 18. Al-Saeed AH, Constantino MI, Molyneaux L, D’Souza M, Limacher-Gisler F, Luo C, Wu T, Twigg SM, Yue DK, Wong J. An inverse relationship between age of type 2 diabetes onset and complication risk and mortality: the impact of youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39:823–29. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0991 [PubMed]
- 19. Hillier TA, Pedula KL. Complications in young adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes: losing the relative protection of youth. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26:2999–3005. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.11.2999 [PubMed]
- 20. Solis-Herrera C, Triplitt CL, Lynch JL. Nephropathy in youth and young adults with type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2014; 14:456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-013-0456-y [PubMed]
- 21. Zheng L, Chen X, Luo T, Ran X, Hu J, Cheng Q, Yang S, Wu J, Li Q, Wang Z. Early-onset type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for end-stage renal disease in patients with diabetic kidney disease. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020; 17:E50. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200076 [PubMed]
- 22. Zhang J, Wang Y, Gurung P, Wang T, Li L, Zhang R, Li H, Guo R, Han Q, Zhang J, Lei S, Liu F. The relationship between the thickness of glomerular basement membrane and renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Acta Diabetol. 2018; 55:669–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-018-1128-9 [PubMed]
- 23. Bjerg L, Hulman A, Carstensen B, Charles M, Witte DR, Jørgensen ME. Effect of duration and burden of microvascular complications on mortality rate in type 1 diabetes: an observational clinical cohort study. Diabetologia. 2019; 62:633–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4812-6 [PubMed]
- 24. Wan Nazaimoon WM, Letchuman R, Noraini N, Ropilah AR, Zainal M, Ismail IS, Wan Mohamad WB, Faridah I, Singaraveloo M, Sheriff IH, Khalid BA. Systolic hypertension and duration of diabetes mellitus are important determinants of retinopathy and microalbuminuria in young diabetics. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999; 46:213–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00095-9 [PubMed]
- 25. Druet C, Tubiana-Rufi N, Chevenne D, Rigal O, Polak M, Levy-Marchal C. Characterization of insulin secretion and resistance in type 2 diabetes of adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91:401–04. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1672 [PubMed]
- 26. TODAY Study Group. Effects of metformin, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in TODAY. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36:1749–57. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2393 [PubMed]
- 27. Jali MV, Kambar S, Jali SM, Gowda S. Familial early onset of type-2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. N Am J Med Sci. 2009; 1:377–80. https://doi.org/10.4297/najms.2009.7377 [PubMed]
- 28. Ng MC, Lee SC, Ko GT, Li JK, So WY, Hashim Y, Barnett AH, Mackay IR, Critchley JA, Cockram CS, Chan JC. Familial early-onset type 2 diabetes in Chinese patients: obesity and genetics have more significant roles than autoimmunity. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:663–71. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.4.663 [PubMed]
- 29. Wang Y, Zhao L, Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhang R, Li H, Guo R, Han Q, Wang T, Li L, Wang S, Liu F. Implications of a family history of diabetes and rapid eGFR decline in patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven diabetic kidney disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00855 [PubMed]
- 30. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41:S13–S27. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S002 [PubMed]
- 31. Tervaert TW, Mooyaart AL, Amann K, Cohen AH, Cook HT, Drachenberg CB, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Haas M, de Heer E, Joh K, Noël LH, Radhakrishnan J, et al, and Renal Pathology Society. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 21:556–63. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010010010 [PubMed]
- 32. Luk AO, Lau ES, So WY, Ma RC, Kong AP, Ozaki R, Chow FC, Chan JC. Prospective study on the incidences of cardiovascular-renal complications in Chinese patients with young-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37:149–57. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1336 [PubMed]
- 33. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, Dills D, Kampik A, Pararajasegaram R, Verdaguer JT, and Global Diabetic Retinopathy Project Group. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1677–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00475-5 [PubMed]