Characterizing the gut microbiome changes with aging in a novel Alzheimer’s disease rat model

Akash Nagarajan; Hemant Srivastava; Casey D. Morrow; Liou Y. Sun

doi:10.18632/aging.204484

Research Paper Volume 15, Issue 2 pp 459—471

Characterizing the gut microbiome changes with aging in a novel Alzheimer’s disease rat model

Akash Nagarajan^1, , Hemant Srivastava^1, , Casey D. Morrow^2, , Liou Y. Sun^1, ,

¹ Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35254, USA
² Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

Received: April 26, 2022 Accepted: December 22, 2022 Published: January 13, 2023

https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204484
How to Cite

Copyright: © 2023 Nagarajan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most devastating diseases currently in the world with no effective treatments. There is increasing evidence that the gut microbiome plays a role in AD. Here we set out to study the age-related changes in the microbiome of the Tgf344-AD rats. We performed 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing on the fecal samples of male rats at 14 and 20 months of age. We found the Tgf344-AD rats to have decreased microbial diversity compared to controls at 14 months of age and this was found to be opposite at 20 months of age. Interestingly, we found a distinctive shift in the microbial community structure of the rats with aging along with changes in the microbiota composition. Some of the observed changes in the Tgf344AD rats were in the genera Bifidobacterium, Ruminococcus, Parasutterella, Lachnoclostridium and Butyricicoccus. Other age-related changes occuring in both the Tgf344-AD and WT control rats were decreases in Enterohaldus, Escherichia Shigella, Rothia and increase in Turicibacter and Clostrium_senso_stricto. Our study has shown that gut microbiota changes occurs in this Alzheimer’s disease rat model.

Introduction

The gut microbiome has been found to be altered in patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease [1], multiple sclerosis [2], Parkinson’s disease [3] and psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety and autism spectrum disorder [4]. The gut brain axis is a well-coordinated network between the intestinal microbiota, enteric nervous system (ENS) and the central nervous system (CNS) and they communicate with each other through neural, endocrine and immune mediators [5]. Understanding more about the gut microbiota changes associated with neurodegeneration and aging may help us in elucidating the complex crosstalk between the gut and the brain. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative disease which affects primarily individuals of old age. Aging is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and chances of developing dementia or AD increases exponentially in the later stages of life (>65years) [6]. Both Alzheimer’s disease and biological aging have shown to cause gut microbiome alterations [1, 7].

There is evidence from rodent models of disease and human patients that AD may be linked with gut microbiome changes. A study in an AD mice model has also shown that gut microbiota alterations are observed in those mice [8]. Two recent fecal matter transplant (FMT) studies in AD mice models have shown that it can improve memory and reduce beta amyloid pathology in the brain [9, 10]. Recent clinical studies in human AD patients from 2 different geographical locations have also shown that gut microbiota changes are associated with Alzheimer’s disease [11]. There was also a recent report of dramatic reduction in Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in a patient after fecal matter transplantation to treat C. difficile infection [12]. These studies posit a view that gut microbiome modulation could be a potential therapy for treating AD.

Gut microbiome composition changes have been found to occur with aging in many different species of animals including humans. Whether they play a causal role in the aging process is uncertain. The gut microbiota has been shown to modulate the lifespan in short-lived vertebrates and a progeroid mouse model. This was demonstrated by fecal matter transplantation studies of young microbiome in killifish [13] and progeroid mice [14] which resulted in an extension of lifespan. These studies show that the microbiome may play an important role in the aging process.

Here we have characterized the gut microbiota changes occurring due to the Alzheimer’s pathology along with aging associated changes in the Tgf344-AD rat model [15]. The Tgf344-AD rat model was developed in 2013 by Cohen et al. and since then many different studies have been published studying various aspects of AD using this rat model. This rat model demonstrates some unique characteristics compared to other rat models such as manifestation of neurofibrillary tangles in the absence of other human tau mutations and also consistent and extensive neuronal loss. These rats show progressive neurodegeneration and amyloidosis in the brain precedes other disease pathology events such as tauopathy, gliosis and neuronal death. This rat model shows pathology and behavioral changes by 14 months of age and this is the first time point we have chosen to study the microbiome changes. We used male Tgf344-AD rats and wildtype control rats for our study and fecal samples were collected at 14 and 20 months of age for analyses.

Methods

Animals

Breeder rat pairs of TgF344-AD rats (wild-type females and transgenic males) were obtained from Dr. Terrence Town of USC and these were bred together create the initial litter and the subsequent experimental colony. All rats were maintained in a normal 12-h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All animals were housed at Research Support Building (RSB) University of Alabama, Birmingham. All experiments and procedures were conducted in compliance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All the rats were weaned at 3 weeks of age and tail clips were taken for genotyping. Genotyping by PCR on the transgenes was performed as previously described. Transgenic and wild-type rats were cohoused together.

Fecal sample collection

Fecal pellets were collected from the Tgf344-AD and WT control rats at ages: 14 months and 20 months of age (WT14M, AD14M, WT20M, AD20M). Only male rat samples were chosen for this study. The fecal pellets were collected at the same time of the day for consistency. Rats were moved to individual autoclaved cages and housed separately at the time of sample collection. The cages which were sterilized before each rat was placed in it. 2–3 fecal pellets were collected per rat. The fecal pellets were placed into 1.5 mL tubes and immediately stored in ice. All the collected fecal pellets were transported to the −80°C freezer within 2 hours of collection. The fecal samples were transferred to the UAB Microbiome Resource before DNA extraction, where they were stored at a −20°C freezer.

DNA extraction and 16s rRNA sequencing

DNA extraction process was performed on the chosen samples using the Fecal DNA Isolation Kit from Zymo Research according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The isolated DNA was then used for PCR or stored in Tris-EDTA buffer for later use. The DNA was quantified in a Spectrophotometer before PCR. PCR amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was carried out using unique barcoded primers to create an amplicon library.

The individual PCR products were run on an Agarose gel, bands visualized by UV illumination and they were in turn excised and purified by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The PCR products were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform by 250 bp paired-end sequencing.

Bioinformatic and statistical analysis

Demultiplexed data files was obtained from the UAB Microbiome Resource after the sequencing process. In the first step of the analysis, the FASTQC files were imported into the Quantitative insights for microbial ecology 2 (QIIME2) environment as qza files using the “import” function and the manifest method. DADA2 denoising algorithm was used to cluster the sequence at 99% similarity. DADA2 workflow implements the following steps: filtering of the reads, dereplication, chimera removal and merging of paired-end reads. The final output from DADA2 is an ASV table and the representative sequences file containing the ASV ID matching with an amplicon sequence read. A Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the q2-phylogeny plugin and the align-to-tree-mafft-fasttree pipeline. Alpha and Beta diversity analysis were performed in QIIME2 and rarefaction was done to ensure the same number of random sequencing reads were used for all samples. Taxonomic classification of the amplicon reads was performed based on the SILVA database using a naïve Bayes classifier. Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and Observed ASV’s were the two alpha diversity measures calculated. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the alpha diversity measures.

Unweighted Unifrac distance was calculated to assess Beta diversity. Unweighted Unifrac distance matrix were used to create the Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot in QIIME2 and in R using phyloseq. Statistical analysis was performed using the Unweighted Unifrac distances between groups using Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) testing. Linear discriminant analysis by effect size (LEfSe) was used to determine the differentially abundant taxa between the different groups. LEfSe uses a non-parametric factorial Kruskal Wallis test to detect features which are differentially represented between groups. LEfSe was performed using GALAXY [16] and the results were plotted as a Cladogram and as LDA histograms. As with other analyses, both genotypic and age-related comparisons were made. Phyloseq [17], vegan packages [18] were used in R for various microbiome analyses.

Results

To investigate the gut microbiota changes in the Tgf344 AD rat model and to study the age-related microbiome changes, we collected and sequenced fecal samples from rats at 2 different ages (14 months and 20 months). Firstly, we focused on (i). The genotypic differences at 14 months and 20 months of age and (ii). The age-related changes for both the WT control rats and the Tgf344-AD rats.

Richness and diversity of experimental groups

To assess the richness and diversity of the samples, alpha diversity measures was examined. Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and Observed ASV’s were the 2 metrices calculated and comparisons were done to assess both the genotypic changes and age-related changes. The 14-month-old Tgf-344AD rats showed a decrease in both metrics (Figure 1A, 1B), faiths PD and observed Features (Kruskal Wallis test; p = 0.0054 and 0.05; Tables 1 and 2), and at the 20-month time point, this was found to be reversed. The WT control rats showed a steep decrease in both alpha diversity metrices at 20 months of age. There was increased diversity in the Tgf344-AD rats when compared to WT control rats (p = 0.09 and 0.07; Tables 1 and 2) at 20 months of age but it was not statistically significant. The age-related decrease in both diversity and number of observed ASV’s for the WT animals was significant (p = 0.005 and 0.033; Tables 1 and 2) while for the AD rats there is a tendency towards an increase, but it was not statistically significant. The Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes (F:B) ratio has been viewed as a biomarker of intestinal homeostasis and frequently observed with obesity. The Tgf344-AD rats did not show any changes in the Firmicutes:Bacteriodetes ratio when compared to WT control rats at both the ages (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. Richness and diversity of experimental groups. (A) Faith’s Phylogenetic diversity and (B) Observed Features for Tgf344-AD and WT control rats at 14 and 20 months of age. (C) Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio for Tgf344-AD and WT control rats at 14 and 20 months of age. Statistical analysis performed using the Kruskal Wallis test; ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01.

Table 1. Faith’s PD statistical analysis.

Comparison	H value	p-value	q-value (adjusted p-value)
AD14M vs. WT14M	9.8	0.001745	0.005341
AD20M vs. WT20M	3.98	0.045	0.091
AD14M vs. AD20M	3.01	0.0826	0.123
WT14M vs. WT20M	9.763	0.00178	0.0053

Table 2. Observed ASV’s statistical analysis.

Comparison	H value	p-value	q-value (adjusted p-value)
AD14M vs. WT14M	5.588	0.018	0.054
AD20M vs. WT20M	4.411	0.0357	0.0714
AD14M vs. AD20M	1.21	0.271	0.271
WT14M vs. WT20M	7.714	0.0055	0.0329
	AD14M	WT14M	AD20M	WT20M
Faith’s PD	16.44 ± 1.99	20.15 ± 1.12	18.5 ± 2.28	14.97 ± 2.73
Observed ASV’s	292 ± 70	383.57 ± 44.1	338 ± 65.45	238.38 ± 73.23

Changes in community structure

To assess the similarity between the overall microbial communities of the groups, Beta diversity indices was calculated using the Unweighted Unifrac distance metric. The three-dimensional visualization of the community structure was done using Principal Coordinates analysis plot (PCoA) carried out using pairwise Unweighted Unifrac distances (Figure 2A). There was a striking change in the microbiota community structure between middle aged and old age animals (Figure 2A–2D). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was carried out on the distance between groups to analyze if the variation was of statistical significance. The age- related changes was statistically significant for the WT group (p = 0.012; Table 3) and showed a trend in the AD group (p = 0.078; Table 3) (Figure 2C, 2D). The genotypic changes (Figure 2E, 2F) were not found to be statistically significant.

$Changes in community structure. (A) Principal coordinate analysis plot of Unweighted Unifrac distance in a 3 dimensional view and (B) 2 dimensional view. PCoA plots stratified to show (C, D) genotypic changes at 14 and 20 months of age; and (E, F) aging changes.$

Figure 2. Changes in community structure. (A) Principal coordinate analysis plot of Unweighted Unifrac distance in a 3 dimensional view and (B) 2 dimensional view. PCoA plots stratified to show (C, D) genotypic changes at 14 and 20 months of age; and (E, F) aging changes.

Table 3. Unweighted Unifrac PERMANOVA results.

Comparison	Pseudo-F	p-value	q-value (adjusted p-value)
AD14M vs. WT14M	1.20	0.158	0.158
AD20M vs. WT20M	1.36	0.096	0.1176
AD14M vs. AD20M	1.478	0.026	0.078
WT14M vs. WT20M	2.339	0.002	0.0120

Taxonomic composition of the gut microbial communities

The taxonomic composition of the gut microbial communities at different levels of classification namely: Phylum, Class, Order and Family, are visualized as stacked bar plots (Figure 3A–3D).

Taxonomic composition of gut microbial communities. Composition of gut microbial communities of the Tgf344-AD and WT control rats, visualized at different levels of classification: (A) Phylum, (B) Class, (C) Order, (D) Family.

Figure 3. Taxonomic composition of gut microbial communities. Composition of gut microbial communities of the Tgf344-AD and WT control rats, visualized at different levels of classification: (A) Phylum, (B) Class, (C) Order, (D) Family.

Gut microbiome changes due to genotype

To determine the changes in the gut microbial communities occurring due to Alzheimer’s disease phenotype and aging, LEfSe was performed (Figure 4A, 4C). Bacterial taxa was found to be changed between AD and WT groups at different levels of taxonomic classification starting at the Phylum level. At the Phylum level, Bacteroidota was decreased in AD rats at 14 months of age (Figure 4B, 4D). At the Class level, Bacteroidia and Actinobacteria were decreased in AD rats at 14 months of age. At 20 months of age, Gammaproteobacteria was increased in the AD rats group. At Order level, Bacteroidales, Clostridia and Bifidobacteriales were found to be decreased at 14 months of age while Burkholderiales was increased at 20 months of age. Some of the prominent family level genotypic changes were Prevotellaceae decreasing in AD group at 14 months and UCG_010, Sutterellaceae, Butyricicoccaceae increasing at 20 months (Figure 5A). The prominent genotypic changes at the genus level was a decrease in Ruminococcus, Bifidobacterium, Parasutterella and increases in Lachnoclostridium at 14 months of age (Figure 5B). At 20 months of age, a prominent change was Butyricicoccus which was increased.

Gut microbiota changes due to AD pathology. Microbial taxa that were differentially represented between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats was determined by LEfSe and visualized by Cladogram and LDA histograms at 14 months (A, B) of age and 20 months (C, D) of age respectively.

Figure 4. Gut microbiota changes due to AD pathology. Microbial taxa that were differentially represented between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats was determined by LEfSe and visualized by Cladogram and LDA histograms at 14 months (A, B) of age and 20 months (C, D) of age respectively.

Differentially represented taxa in the Tgf344-AD rats. Differentially abundant taxa between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats at the (A) Family and (B) Genus levels identified using LefSe.

Figure 5. Differentially represented taxa in the Tgf344-AD rats. Differentially abundant taxa between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats at the (A) Family and (B) Genus levels identified using LefSe.

Gut microbiome changes occurring with increasing age

The number of bacterial taxa found to be differentially represented was much higher for age-related changes compared to genotypic changes. For WT age-related change analysis, most of the differentially represented taxa were found to be decreased at 20 months of age (Figure 6A, 6C). This shows us that there was an age-related decrease in the microbiome composition. For the Tgf344-AD rats group, more bacterial taxa were found to be increased at 20 months of age than those that were found to be decreasing, which is in stark contrast to the WT rats group (Figure 6B, 6D). Class Coriobacteria was found to be decreased in both the groups with age. At the Order level, Micrococcales, Coriobacteriales, Rhizobales, Enterobacterales were found to be reduced in both WT and AD rats (Figure 6B, 6D), while Erysipelotrichales and Clostridiales were increased with age in both the rat groups.

Gut microbiota changes due to aging. The effect of aging on the gut microbial communities of the Tgf344-AD rats and WT rats. Microbial taxa that were differentially represented was determined by LEfSe and visualized by Cladogram (A, B) and LDA histograms (C, D) at 14 months of age and 20 months of age.

Figure 6. Gut microbiota changes due to aging. The effect of aging on the gut microbial communities of the Tgf344-AD rats and WT rats. Microbial taxa that were differentially represented was determined by LEfSe and visualized by Cladogram (A, B) and LDA histograms (C, D) at 14 months of age and 20 months of age.

Some of the prominent changes at the Family level were Enterobacteriaceae, Eggerthellaceae and Streptococcaceae decreasing in both the WT and AD rat groups with age while Erysipelotrichacae and Clostridiaceae were increased in both the rat groups with age (Figure 7A, 7B).

Conserved aging associated changes between both Tgf344-AD and WT control rats. Conserved aging-associated changes between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats. (A, B) Families increasing with age and decreasing with age, (C, D) Genera increasing with age and decreasing with age identified using LefSe.

Figure 7. Conserved aging associated changes between both Tgf344-AD and WT control rats. Conserved aging-associated changes between the Tgf344-AD and WT rats. (A, B) Families increasing with age and decreasing with age, (C, D) Genera increasing with age and decreasing with age identified using LefSe.

The prominent changes at genus level were Rothia, Enterohabdus and Escherichia shigella decreasing in both the AD rats and WT control rats while Turicibacter and Clostrium_sensu_stricto were found to be increased in them (Figure 7C, 7D).

Discussion

The gut microbiota has been associated in many diseases including neurodegenerative diseases. The gut brain axis is hypothesized to have a major role in the disease progression and possibly may even play an etiological role. Aging also influences the microbiome diversity, richness, and composition dramatically [19]. In this study, we have demonstrated, altered gut microbiome changes in a novel Alzheimer’s disease rat model, and the dramatic changes and shifts in microbiome composition and structure due to aging in the Fischer 344 rat model. One notable feature we are looking at, are the changes in the later stage of the animal’s life, as Alzheimer’s disease is an aging-associated disease and is seen only in aged people during the last stages of life. We have characterized the gut microbiota changes at a stage in the animal’s life (late adult to old age) similar to when it affects humans.

There is strong evidence from human clinical studies showing that there are gut microbiome alterations seen in a plethora of diseases [20]. Studies done in germ-free mice and antibiotic-treated mice have consolidated this view that the microbiome plays an important role in these diseases and microbiome composition may be required for healthy aging. Fecal matter transplantation studies have shown that many beneficial characteristics of the donor phenotype such as exercise [21], caloric restriction [22–24] can be recapitulated in the recipient thereby showcasing the important role the microbiome plays in maintaining homeostasis. The opposite is also true where transplant from donor with natural or diet-induced obesity [24] (in the case of mice) or various diseases can also recapitulate some of that negative phenotype. There is also evidence that gut microbiota might enhance the AD pathology as seen from a microbiome depletion study in the APP/PS1 mice model done using antibiotics [25]. Diversity was also found to have a negative correlation with frailty [26]. Similar to human Alzheimer’s patients [1], alpha diversity was found to be decreased in our Tgf344-AD rats at 14 months of age but not 20 months where aging might have obscured the changes. As expected with aging, the alpha diversity was again found to decrease with age in our rats. The dramatic change in the community structure due to aging in our rats was also similar to other rodent microbiome aging studies. Beta diversity changes due to genotype were less prominent when compared with aging which might show that the changes due to AD pathology might be subtle compared to system-wide effects of aging.

Diabetes, obesity are risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease, and insulin resistance and disrupted glucose metabolism have been hypothesized to be causal factors in Alzheimer’s disease [27]. Firmicutes:Bacteriodetes ratio is a commonly studied variable in microbiome studies and it has been commonly associated with obesity [28]. Changes in the Firmicutes:Bacteriodetes ratio has also been observed with aging [29]. We found no change in F:B ratio between groups in our animals including with age where gut dysbiosis has been hypothesized to occur with aging. There have been 2 previous microbiome studies done in human Alzheimer’s disease patients so far [1, 11] and they have shown the diversity to be decreased and alterations in community structure like our Tgf344-AD rats. However there has been differences in the results observed with respect to differentially expressed taxa, the phyla Bacteroidetes increased and Actinobacteria decreased in one study while the opposite was observed in the other study. This discrepancy may have been due to many other factors such as geographical location, diet, ethnicity etc., Further studies investigating whether SCFA (short chain fatty acids) levels are changed in bloodstream and the intestines are required along with characterizing these changes. This is because altered SCFA production might play a possible mechanistic role in disease initiation as something similar was observed in the case of Parkinson’s disease where SCFA treatment could reproduce many features of the disease in mice. In our Tgf344-AD rats, the phyla Bacteroidetes was found to be decreased similar to one of the human studies. Other studies have also found Bacteroides fragilis to be reduced in patients with cognitive impairment and brain amyloidosis [30].

The gut microbiome may influence brain activity over time through the gut brain axis and that could be happen through the vagus nerve. Vagus nerve can sense microbial metabolites in gut and may transmit a signal to the brain which may in turn elicit a response distinct from normal state [31]. There has been previous evidence showing that gut microbiome changes may influence behavioral changes affecting learning and regulate neuronal function in mice [32]. Similarly in our Tgf344AD rat model the gut microbiome changes could in turn affect neuronal function and can have a bidirectional link. Another notable change was the reduction of Bifidobacterium in the Tgf344-AD rats which is a well-known probiotic genus. Bifidobacterium has been linked with anti-inflammatory properties [33] and decrease in intestinal permeability. A previous study has also demonstrated that Bifidobacterium supplementation can improve cognition in an anxious mouse model of AD [34]. This change in Bifidobacterium was not visible at 20 months of age where aging might have obscured the genotypic changes. In our Tgf344-AD rats, Parasutterella which has been previously associated with irritable bowel syndrome [35] was found to be reduced at 14 months of age. A study found that increasing Parasutterella levels were correlated with decreasing low-density lipoprotein levels [36]. Ruminococcus is a genus which has been linked with Alzheimer’s disease in two previous studies and in our Tgf344-AD rats, they showed a similar decrease [37]. Prevotellaceae has been previously associated with APOE4 positive humans and transgenic mice [38], and in our Tgf344-AD rats they were found to be decreased. Blautia which has been linked with Alzheimer’s from clinical studies, were also found increased in the Tgf344-AD rats at 20 months of age [1]. It has also been previously associated in Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis patients. Blautia has been seen to have an inverse association with visceral fat [39] and is found to be involved in anti-inflammatory processes. Higher Blautia has been associated with disturbances in glucose metabolism, type-2 diabetes and high fat diet and it was also found to be depleted in obese children [40]. The butyrate producer, Butyricicoccus was also increased in the Tgf344-AD rats at 20 months of age.

Another interesting observation was that a lot of taxa changes were observed in the family Lachnospiraceae in the Tgf344-AD rats when compared to control rats. Similar changes have also been reported in a human Alzheimer’s microbiome study [37]. This may indicate a possible common phenomenon occurring in both patients and the preclinical rat model. Lachnospiraceae are major producers of SCFA’s including butyrate and form an important part of the gut microbiota. Turicibacter has been previously found to be increased with aging in other studies [41, 42] and it is also correlated with higher fat mass [43]. Romboutsia has been termed a harmful bacteria with increases observed in certain disease states [44]. Changes in the family level due to aging such as Erysipelotrichaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae were also found to be changed in other aging microbiome studies in mice [45, 46].

In summary, we found gut microbiota changes in the Tgf344-AD rats when compared to age-matched control WT rats with taxonomic changes observed at various levels. The aging-associated changes in the gut microbiome was prominent and shows the important role aging plays in disrupting homeostasis in the body.

Abbreviations

AD: Alzheimer’s disease.

Author Contributions

A.N. took the lead in writing the manuscript, collecting samples and all data analysis. L.S. conceived the study, experimental design and writing the manuscript. H.S. helped in setting up the animal colony. C.D.M. helped in sequencing the samples.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the UAB Microbiome Resource and Dr. Eipers with sample processing for sequencing. We thank the members of the Sun lab for their helpful discussion and comments on the revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Ethical Statement

All experiments and procedures were conducted in compliance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Funding

This work was supported in part by National Institute on Aging grants AG048264, AG057734 and AG050225 (L.S.).

References

1. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, Carlsson CM, Asthana S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Bendlin BB, Rey FE. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:13537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y [PubMed]
2. Berer K, Gerdes LA, Cekanaviciute E, Jia X, Xiao L, Xia Z, Liu C, Klotz L, Stauffer U, Baranzini SE, Kümpfel T, Hohlfeld R, Krishnamoorthy G, Wekerle H. Gut microbiota from multiple sclerosis patients enables spontaneous autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114:10719–24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711233114 [PubMed]
3. Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, Challis C, Schretter CE, Rocha S, Gradinaru V, Chesselet MF, Keshavarzian A, Shannon KM, et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson's Disease. Cell. 2016; 167:1469–80.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018 [PubMed]
4. Sharon G, Cruz NJ, Kang DW, Gandal MJ, Wang B, Kim YM, Zink EM, Casey CP, Taylor BC, Lane CJ, Bramer LM, Isern NG, Hoyt DW, et al. Human Gut Microbiota from Autism Spectrum Disorder Promote Behavioral Symptoms in Mice. Cell. 2019; 177:1600–18.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.004 [PubMed]
5. Cox LM, Weiner HL. Microbiota Signaling Pathways that Influence Neurologic Disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2018; 15:135–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0598-8 [PubMed]
6. Corrada MM, Brookmeyer R, Paganini-Hill A, Berlau D, Kawas CH. Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest old: the 90+ study. Ann Neurol. 2010; 67:114–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21915 [PubMed]
7. Galkin F, Mamoshina P, Aliper A, Putin E, Moskalev V, Gladyshev VN, Zhavoronkov A. Human Gut Microbiome Aging Clock Based on Taxonomic Profiling and Deep Learning. iScience. 2020; 23:101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101199 [PubMed]
8. Zhang L, Wang Y, Xiayu X, Shi C, Chen W, Song N, Fu X, Zhou R, Xu YF, Huang L, Zhu H, Han Y, Qin C. Altered Gut Microbiota in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 60:1241–57. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170020 [PubMed]
9. Holsinger RMD, Elangovan S. Neuroprotective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: Development of new models and analysis methods/validation of pre-clinical methods. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020; 16:e046523. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.046523
10. Sun J, Xu J, Ling Y, Wang F, Gong T, Yang C, Ye S, Ye K, Wei D, Song Z, Chen D, Liu J. Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviated Alzheimer's disease-like pathogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2019; 9:189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0525-3 [PubMed]
11. Zhuang ZQ, Shen LL, Li WW, Fu X, Zeng F, Gui L, Lü Y, Cai M, Zhu C, Tan YL, Zheng P, Li HY, Zhu J, et al. Gut Microbiota is Altered in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018; 63:1337–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180176 [PubMed]
12. Hazan S. Rapid improvement in Alzheimer's disease symptoms following fecal microbiota transplantation: a case report. J Int Med Res. 2020; 48:300060520925930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520925930 [PubMed]
13. Smith P, Willemsen D, Popkes M, Metge F, Gandiwa E, Reichard M, Valenzano DR. Regulation of life span by the gut microbiota in the short-lived African turquoise killifish. Elife. 2017; 6:e27014. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27014 [PubMed]
14. Bárcena C, Valdés-Mas R, Mayoral P, Garabaya C, Durand S, Rodríguez F, Fernández-García MT, Salazar N, Nogacka AM, Garatachea N, Bossut N, Aprahamian F, Lucia A, et al. Healthspan and lifespan extension by fecal microbiota transplantation into progeroid mice. Nat Med. 2019; 25:1234–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0504-5 [PubMed]
15. Cohen RM, Rezai-Zadeh K, Weitz TM, Rentsendorj A, Gate D, Spivak I, Bholat Y, Vasilevko V, Glabe CG, Breunig JJ, Rakic P, Davtyan H, Agadjanyan MG, et al. A transgenic Alzheimer rat with plaques, tau pathology, behavioral impairment, oligomeric aβ, and frank neuronal loss. J Neurosci. 2013; 33:6245–56. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3672-12.2013 [PubMed]
16. Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:W537–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky379 [PubMed]
17. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [PubMed]
18. Dixon P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci. 2003; 14:927–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x
19. Kong F, Deng F, Li Y, Zhao J. Identification of gut microbiome signatures associated with longevity provides a promising modulation target for healthy aging. Gut Microbes. 2019; 10:210–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1494102 [PubMed]
20. Bull MJ, Plummer NT. Part 1: The Human Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease. Integr Med (Encinitas). 2014; 13:17–22. [PubMed]
21. Lai ZL, Tseng CH, Ho HJ, Cheung CKY, Lin JY, Chen YJ, Cheng FC, Hsu YC, Lin JT, El-Omar EM, Wu CY. Fecal microbiota transplantation confers beneficial metabolic effects of diet and exercise on diet-induced obese mice. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:15625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33893-y [PubMed]
22. Fabbiano S, Suárez-Zamorano N, Chevalier C, Lazarević V, Kieser S, Rigo D, Leo S, Veyrat-Durebex C, Gaïa N, Maresca M, Merkler D, Gomez de Agüero M, Macpherson A, et al. Functional Gut Microbiota Remodeling Contributes to the Caloric Restriction-Induced Metabolic Improvements. Cell Metab. 2018; 28:907–21.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.005 [PubMed]
23. Pérez-Matute P, Íñiguez M, de Toro M, Recio-Fernández E, Oteo JA. Autologous fecal transplantation from a lean state potentiates caloric restriction effects on body weight and adiposity in obese mice. Sci Rep. 2020; 10:9388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64961-x [PubMed]
24. Zoll J, Read MN, Heywood SE, Estevez E, Marshall JPS, Kammoun HL, Allen TL, Holmes AJ, Febbraio MA, Henstridge DC. Fecal microbiota transplantation from high caloric-fed donors alters glucose metabolism in recipient mice, independently of adiposity or exercise status. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 319:E203–16. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00037.2020 [PubMed]
25. Harach T, Marungruang N, Duthilleul N, Cheatham V, Mc Coy KD, Frisoni G, Neher JJ, Fåk F, Jucker M, Lasser T, Bolmont T. Reduction of Abeta amyloid pathology in APPPS1 transgenic mice in the absence of gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41802. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41802 [PubMed]
26. Jackson MA, Jeffery IB, Beaumont M, Bell JT, Clark AG, Ley RE, O'Toole PW, Spector TD, Steves CJ. Erratum to: signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota. Genome Med. 2016; 8:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0275-2 [PubMed]
27. Nguyen TT, Ta QTH, Nguyen TKO, Nguyen TTD, Giau VV. Type 3 Diabetes and Its Role Implications in Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:3165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093165 [PubMed]
28. Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P, Balamurugan R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients. 2020; 12:1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051474 [PubMed]
29. Vaiserman A, Romanenko M, Piven L, Moseiko V, Lushchak O, Kryzhanovska N, Guryanov V, Koliada A. Differences in the gut Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio across age groups in healthy Ukrainian population. BMC Microbiol. 2020; 20:221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01903-7 [PubMed]
30. Cattaneo A, Cattane N, Galluzzi S, Provasi S, Lopizzo N, Festari C, Ferrari C, Guerra UP, Paghera B, Muscio C, Bianchetti A, Volta GD, Turla M, et al, and INDIA-FBP Group. Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2017; 49:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.019 [PubMed]
31. Bonaz B, Bazin T, Pellissier S. The Vagus Nerve at the Interface of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00049 [PubMed]
32. Chu C, Murdock MH, Jing D, Won TH, Chung H, Kressel AM, Tsaava T, Addorisio ME, Putzel GG, Zhou L, Bessman NJ, Yang R, Moriyama S, et al. The microbiota regulate neuronal function and fear extinction learning. Nature. 2019; 574:543–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1644-y [PubMed]
33. Riedel CU, Foata F, Philippe D, Adolfsson O, Eikmanns BJ, Blum S. Anti-inflammatory effects of bifidobacteria by inhibition of LPS-induced NF-kappaB activation. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12:3729–35. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i23.3729 [PubMed]
34. Kim H, Kim S, Park SJ, Park G, Shin H, Park MS, Kim J. Administration of Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum BORI Improves Cognitive and Memory Function in the Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13:709091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.709091 [PubMed]
35. Chen YJ, Wu H, Wu SD, Lu N, Wang YT, Liu HN, Dong L, Liu TT, Shen XZ. Parasutterella, in association with irritable bowel syndrome and intestinal chronic inflammation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 33:1844–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14281 [PubMed]
36. Bush JR, Alfa MJ. Increasing levels of Parasutterella in the gut microbiome correlate with improving low-density lipoprotein levels in healthy adults consuming resistant potato starch during a randomised trial. BMC Nutr. 2020; 6:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-020-00398-9 [PubMed]
37. Liu P, Wu L, Peng G, Han Y, Tang R, Ge J, Zhang L, Jia L, Yue S, Zhou K, Li L, Luo B, Wang B. Altered microbiomes distinguish Alzheimer's disease from amnestic mild cognitive impairment and health in a Chinese cohort. Brain Behav Immun. 2019; 80:633–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.05.008 [PubMed]
38. Tran TTT, Corsini S, Kellingray L, Hegarty C, Le Gall G, Narbad A, Müller M, Tejera N, O'Toole PW, Minihane AM, Vauzour D. APOE genotype influences the gut microbiome structure and function in humans and mice: relevance for Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. FASEB J. 2019; 33:8221–31. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201900071R [PubMed]
39. Ozato N, Saito S, Yamaguchi T, Katashima M, Tokuda I, Sawada K, Katsuragi Y, Kakuta M, Imoto S, Ihara K, Nakaji S. Blautia genus associated with visceral fat accumulation in adults 20-76 years of age. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2019; 5:28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-019-0101-x [PubMed]
40. Benítez-Páez A, Gómez Del Pugar EM, López-Almela I, Moya-Pérez Á, Codoñer-Franch P, Sanz Y. Depletion of Blautia Species in the Microbiota of Obese Children Relates to Intestinal Inflammation and Metabolic Phenotype Worsening. mSystems. 2020; 5:e00857-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00857-19 [PubMed]
41. Zhang X, Yang Y, Su J, Zheng X, Wang C, Chen S, Liu J, Lv Y, Fan S, Zhao A, Chen T, Jia W, Wang X. Age-related compositional changes and correlations of gut microbiome, serum metabolome, and immune factor in rats. GeroScience. 2021; 43:709–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00188-y [PubMed]
42. Liu A, Lv H, Wang H, Yang H, Li Y, Qian J. Aging Increases the Severity of Colitis and the Related Changes to the Gut Barrier and Gut Microbiota in Humans and Mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020; 75:1284–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz263 [PubMed]
43. Binyamin D, Werbner N, Nuriel-Ohayon M, Uzan A, Mor H, Abbas A, Ziv O, Teperino R, Gutman R, Koren O. The aging mouse microbiome has obesogenic characteristics. Genome Med. 2020; 12:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00784-9 [PubMed]
44. Bojović K, Ignjatović ÐI, Soković Bajić S, Vojnović Milutinović D, Tomić M, Golić N, Tolinački M. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Associated With Altered Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020; 10:223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00223 [PubMed]
45. Conley MN, Wong CP, Duyck KM, Hord N, Ho E, Sharpton TJ. Aging and serum MCP-1 are associated with gut microbiome composition in a murine model. PeerJ. 2016; 4:e1854. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1854 [PubMed]
46. Langille MG, Meehan CJ, Koenig JE, Dhanani AS, Rose RA, Howlett SE, Beiko RG. Microbial shifts in the aging mouse gut. Microbiome. 2014; 2:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-014-0050-9 [PubMed]

Research Paper Volume 15, Issue 2 pp 459—471